Case of the Month

69-year-old patient with immune-related SJS/TEN overlap after PD-L1 inhibitor therapy

Medical history
  • April 2025: Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    • June 2025: Five cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy; discontinued due to toxicity
  • May 2025: Metastatic cancer of unknown primary (CUP), nodal manifestation
    • Histology: moderately differentiated, p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma (DD anal carcinoma; DD cervical carcinoma)
Oncological Therapy
  • September 2025: First administration of atezolizumab monotherapy
Immune-related adverse event

Three weeks after the first atezolizumab infusion, the patient presented with high fever, severe mucositis, conjunctivitis, and intense ocular pain preventing eye opening. A skin biopsy confirmed Stevens–Johnson syndrome / toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) overlap.

How we proceeded

The patient received high-dose methylprednisolone, broad-spectrum antibiotics, IV acyclovir, intensive topical dermatologic and ophthalmologic treatment, strong opioid-based analgesia, and parenteral nutrition. Due to ongoing symptoms, a therapy escalation using IVIG and mycophenolate mofetil was performed and the case was discussed in our interdisciplinary Toxboard. Afterwards, oral erosions, cutaneous and ocular findings improved significantly.

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–associated SJS/TEN overlap is a very rare but life-threatening immune-related adverse event with an estimated incidence below 0.01%. Clinically, patients show rapidly progressive erythema and atypical target lesions, with epidermal detachment ranging from <10% in SJS, 10–30% in SJS/TEN overlap, to >30% in TEN. Mucosal involvement—ocular, oral, or genital—is frequent. Prognosis is commonly estimated using SCORTEN. It is thought to result from ICI-induced hyperactivation of cytotoxic CD8⁺ T cells and overexpression of effector molecules such as perforin, granzyme B, FasL, and granulysin, leading to widespread keratinocyte apoptosis. Compared with classical drug-induced SJS/TEN overlap, latency may be longer and onset can occur up to 8 weeks after treatment initiation. Early recognition, immediate discontinuation of the ICI, systemic corticosteroids, escalation to IVIG or other immunomodulators, and optimal supportive care are crucial for outcome.

References
  1. Chirasuthat P, Chayavichitsilp P. Atezolizumab-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a patient with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Case Rep Dermatol. 2018;10(2):198–202. doi:10.1159/000492172. 
  2. Nordmann TM, Anderton H, Hasegawa A, et al. Spatial proteomics identifies JAKi as treatment for a lethal skin disease. Nature. 2024;635(8040):1001-1009. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08061-0
  3. Satoh TK, Neulinger MM, Stadler PC, Aoki R, French LE. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced epidermal necrolysis: a narrative review evaluating demographics, clinical features, and culprit medications. J Dermatol. 2024;51(1):3–11. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.17039.

39-year-old patient with ICANS after ICI therapy

Medical history

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Modified Ann Arbor classification: stage IIB

Oncological Therapy
  • December 2024: First diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (Epstein–Barr virus negative)
  • December 2024 – April 2025: Treatment with brentuximab vedotin combined with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; initial remission followed by relapse in May 2025
  • May 2025: Therapy switched to pembrolizumab
Immune-related adverse event

Approximately four hours after the first dose: severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) requiring intermediate and intensive care; good response to high-dose methylprednisolone.

How we proceeded

Discussion in the interdisciplinary Toxicity Board: Due to the favorable tumor response to pembrolizumab and the effective management of ICANS with steroids, rechallenge with pembrolizumab was considered.

  • June 2025: Pembrolizumab restarted under steroid coverage; complete remission on PET-CT
  • July 2025: Detection of partial osseous relapse; clinically stable
  • August 2025: Fourth cycle of pembrolizumab well tolerated
Background

Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after an immune-related adverse event (irAE) carries an approximately one-third risk of recurrence of the immunemediated side effect. ICANS is a neurotoxic syndrome characterized by encephalopathy, speech disturbances, seizures, decreased vigilance, and cerebral edema. Pathophysiologically, cytokine-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption plays a central role. ICANS frequently occurs after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, with significantly higher incidence and severity. In contrast, fulminant ICANS is extremely rare with ICIs but has been occasionally reported and requires prompt, interdisciplinary management.

References
  • Zhao, Q., et al. (2021). Safety and Efficacy of the Rechallenge of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors After Immune-Related Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 747267.
  • Genoud, V., & Migliorini, D. (2023). Novel pathophysiological insights into CAR-T cell-associated neurotoxicity. Frontiers in Immunology, 14, 1150532

80-year-old male patient with Nivolumab induced Multi-Toxicity

Medical history
  • Metastatic cutaneous melanoma, AJCC stage IV (pT4 N0 M1b)
  • BRAF: Wildtype
  • Pulmonary metastases
Oncological Therapy
  • 08/2017: Excision Melanoma left forearm, pT4 N0 M0 – AJCC Stage IIC
  • 05/2020: Multiple pulmonary metastases, pT4 N0 M1b – AJCC Stage IV
  • 05/2020: Start Nivolumab 240 mg i.v. (no combination therapy with Ipilimumab+Nivolumab because of advanced age), discontinued due to immune-related Multi-Toxicity
  • 06/2025: Staging: Minor progression of a pulmonary nodule, no clinically relevant tumor progression
Immune-related adverse event

The patient developed multiple ICI-associated toxicities (irAdrenalitis treated with hydrocortisone, irPsoriasis treated with apremilast, right gonarthritis treated with intra-articular steroid, short systemic steroid courses and  MTX – MTX stopped in 04/2024). In 11/2024 an asymptomatic troponin rise and cardiac MRI findings (diffuse myocardial edema, subtle non-ischaemic Late Gadolinium Enhancement, preserved Ejection fraction) were suspicious for irMyocarditis.

How we proceeded

The cardiologic department recommended stopping nivolumab and close monitoring. Nivolumab was discontinued (11/2024) and the course was conservative with serial troponin and cardiac MRIs: In 06/2025 the cardiac MRI still shows persistent edema but the patient is asymptomatic and troponin is only slightly elevated (0.02 ng/ml). At the interdisciplinary ToxBoard (07/2025) escalation to high-dose systemic steroids was advised because of the persistent myocarditis activity.

Could we continue the therapy?

Currently, re-challenge with ICI is not recommended in the setting of myocarditis and multiple other severe irAEs. It is possible in highly selected cases after resolution of irAEs, extensive multidisciplinary risk–benefit assessment and informed consent.

Background

Multi-toxicity refers to the simultaneous or sequential occurrence of irAEs across multiple organ systems. It is particularly common with combined ipilimumab + nivolumab therapy, occurring in up to 40% of patients. Management is especially challenging because the ideal approach treats all active irAEs without impairing antitumor efficacy by using multiple second-line immunosuppressive agents.

Our conclusion

Discontinuation of nivolumab was appropriate given cardiac involvement and prior multi-organ irAEs and stable tumor disease; continue close monitoring and treat with high-dose steroids because of persistent myocardial inflammation.

References
  • ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines — management of immunotherapy toxicities.
  • ASCO guidelines / consensus statements on immune-related adverse events.
  • Li, Y., G. Pond, and E. McWhirter, Multisystem Immune-Related Adverse Events from Dual-Agent Immunotherapy Use. Curr Oncol, 2024. 31(1): p. 425-435.

65-year-old male patient with Pembrolizumab-induced Lichen planus

Medical history

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stage IV M1C (UICC):

Spleen, kidney, and bone metastases

Initial diagnosis: April 24

Oncological Therapy

04/2024: Initial diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC

04/2024: Cerebral radiation therapy

05/2024: Initiation of combined immunochemotherapy with 6 cycles of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and 200 mg pembrolizumab

Since August 2024: 200 mg pembrolizumab qw3, NSCLC in partial response

Immune-related adverse event

Since December 2024, the patient has reported severe pruritus (VAS 8/10) along with the appearance of multiple erythematous papules. Treatment with topical and oral steroids, including 20 mg of prednisolone prescribed by the oncologist and general practitioner, was initiated but proved ineffective.

How we proceeded

In February 2025, the patient presented to the dermatology department. At that time, oral prednisolone was gradually tapered, and a skin biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of lichen planus. Following this, treatment with acitretin 20 mg (administered as 0-0-2 from February 28 to May 9, 2025) and UVB 311 nm phototherapy (from March 3 to April 14, 2025) was initiated. However, this resulted in only partial improvement, and the condition worsened after discontinuation of the light therapy.

Given the severity of the condition (CTCAE Grade 3 lichen planus) and the insufficient response to UVB 311, steroid and acitretin therapy, methotrexate treatment was started after a multidisciplinary discussion in out ToxBoard. Subcutaneous methotrexate at a dose of 15 mg once weekly was initiated on May 14, 2025. Folic acid supplementation was also started, and topical steroid therapy was continued.

Could we continue the therapy?

Treatment with pembrolizumab was continued.

Background

Despite the clinically significant therapeutic successes, treatment with PD-1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab is associated with a number of immune-mediated side effects that can affect almost any organ system. The skin is particularly frequently affected. Dermatological side effects range from mild manifestations such as pruritus and maculopapular exanthema to autoimmune phenomena such as vitiligo, psoriasis-like changes to severe immune-mediated diseases (1). According to the European S1 guidelines, first-line treatments for lichen planus include the administration of topical or systemic corticosteroids, as well as therapy with acitretin. Second-line options comprise broadband or narrowband UVB phototherapy, a combination of UVB with acitretin, or the topical application of calcineurin inhibitors (2). In cases refractory to these measures, third-line therapies may be considered. These include methotrexate (15–20 mg per week for 4 to 15 weeks), azathioprine (administered orally at 50 mg twice daily or 1–2 mg/kg/day for a duration of 3 to 7 months), cyclophosphamide (50–100 mg/day for 3 to 6 months) as well as extracorporeal photopheresis (2). The literature suggests that methotrexate demonstrates high efficacy and a favorable safety profile, particularly in cases of extensive cutaneous lichen planus, making it a viable alternative to corticosteroids (3). The patient should be clearly informed about the potential risk of worsening the underlying oncological disease with methotrexate therapy. Therefore, a strict and well-considered indication is essential in such cases. An increasing number of reports in the literature have identified extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) as a promising treatment option for steroid-refractory immune-related adverse events, including lichen planus. This is particularly relevant given the immunopathogenic nature of lichen planus, which involves T-cell mediated inflammation. In cases where conventional immunosuppressive therapies fail, ECP offers an immunomodulatory approach that may help restore immune tolerance without the broad immunosuppression associated with systemic steroids. Therefore, ECP should be considered a viable therapeutic option in the management of steroid-refractory lichen planus (4, 5).

Our conclusion

Immune response lichen planus often responds poorly to acitretin. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, phototherapy with 311nm UVB has been shown to provide good relief, but it is indicated with caution in skin tumors. Patients should be advised of the slow onset of action of methotrexate therapy and treated symptomatically for pruritus. ECP is recommended in cases of severe pruritus (VAS 8/10), otherwise sufficient improvement should not be achieved.

References

1. Sibaud V. Dermatologic Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors : Skin Toxicities and Immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(3):345-61.

2. Ioannides D, Vakirlis E, Kemeny L, Marinovic B, Massone C, Murphy R, et al. European S1 guidelines on the management of lichen planus: a cooperation of the European Dermatology Forum with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(7):1403-14.

3. Khurana A, Sharath S, Sardana K. Efficacy And Safety Of Low-Dose Methotrexate In Generalized And Recalcitrant Lichen Planus: A Retrospective Study At A Tertiary Care Center. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024;14(4).

4. Ruf T, Rahimi F, Anz D, Tufman A, Salzer S, Zierold S, et al. Extracorporeal Photopheresis as a Treatment Option for Immune-Related Adverse Events: Two Case Reports and a Prospective Study. J Immunother. 2024;47(6):227-31.

5. Birckel E, Lipsker D, Cribier B. [Efficacy of photopheresis in the treatment of erosive lichen planus: A retrospective study]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2020;147(2):86-92.

Participate

  • Document cases of rare, complex, severe and therapy-refractory side effects induced by immunotherapy
  • Join our team of experts for analysis of irAE
  • Initiate or contribute to research projects with regard to irAE